tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post5518794967552087034..comments2014-01-20T16:37:33.536+10:00Comments on Interpose Mission: Hoagland's Martian missiveUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post-70985813844135950552013-05-25T19:59:24.788+10:002013-05-25T19:59:24.788+10:00I look forward to it, the other thing that is inte...I look forward to it, the other thing that is interesting about that May '77 article is:<br /><br />(a). No reference to the Face on Mars<br />(b). Just how strongly he pushed in that article for manned missions to follow up Viking, which may be a partial answer for why he promoted the Face.<br /><br />You might also want to track down a copy of Alan Steele's novel Labrynth of Night which uses as it's premise that everything Hoagland claimed about Cydonia up to 1991 (When the novel was finished) is true...<br /><br />I have no doubt that a copy of this book occupies pride of place on his bookshelf.Grahamnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post-31098987088684219792013-01-01T09:24:20.886+10:002013-01-01T09:24:20.886+10:00I may eventually touch on that, but right now I...I may eventually touch on that, but right now I'm working on something further about the hyperdimensional physics (echoing) hypothesis. A little bit of a rehash, but I'm trying to wrap my own head around that one. :SAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14235846531323511190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post-13799137155961090892012-12-21T00:37:25.345+10:002012-12-21T00:37:25.345+10:00It's the same for his & Mike Barra's c...It's the same for his & Mike Barra's claims about the Moon, they seem to be based on books by Don Wilson & George Leonard. James Oberg covered the books in question back in the 1982.<br /><br />My interest in Hoagland is finding out the origin of a supposed NASA Manned Mars mission plan he described in the May 1977 issue of Analog in an article entitled "Return to Mars: A Mission for the Enterprise" (He was referring to the space shuttle btw) which bears no resemblance to anything NASA was planning at the time and I'm coming to suspect may have been the product of an early version of the Mars Underground. <br /><br />Grahamnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post-63519858673766434642012-12-17T08:47:14.893+10:002012-12-17T08:47:14.893+10:00Emma,
I did not say that he was godfather of thes...Emma,<br /><br />I did not say that he was godfather of these "anomalies" (if natural landmarks can be called that), but I was only vaguely aware of the earlier "research". Thanks for the information for myself and future readers of this post.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14235846531323511190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post-18497350592776464582012-12-17T08:40:42.942+10:002012-12-17T08:40:42.942+10:00Julian. Good resume,unfortunately there is a misco...Julian. Good resume,unfortunately there is a misconception regarding the paternity of the Cydonia structures mytho (the Face and the pyramids in particular). Hoagland is not the original godfather of Martian anomalies "researches",he merely stole the initial materials from Walter Hain (1979) & James Hurtak (1975-1976).Tara Jordanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05238574438230091981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post-38900967123595780412012-12-17T07:34:28.752+10:002012-12-17T07:34:28.752+10:00Another case of cheating is one I think you mentio...Another case of cheating is one I think you mentioned on your blog, Expat... That sometimes Hoagland takes a multiple of 19.5 or sine, cosine, arcsine, arccosine, arctangent of 19.5, so he actually gives himself about 10 ways I know of to "hit" 19.5... And I've heard him accept something as low as 15 degrees and as high as 25 degrees to equal 19.5. So many latitudes can be found "at" 19.5.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14235846531323511190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7302648013550565615.post-77480332668316169182012-12-17T01:33:42.258+10:002012-12-17T01:33:42.258+10:00Hoagland does recognize the 120° separation in lon...Hoagland does recognize the 120° separation in longitude of the three points of his imaginary tetrahedron, but of course he thinks nothing of cheating, especially if he's before an audience that's not in a position to check.<br /><br />A good example was his confident assertion that the Tohoku earthquake that devastated Fukushima had its epicenter 120° E of the Great Pyramid. It doesn't.expathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10369924104634464934noreply@blogger.com